В Одессе вводится обязательная трудовая служба14:47
В РФ заявили о косвенном вовлечении страны НАТО в конфликт с Россией из-за отдельного решения14:54
。safew对此有专业解读
4月10日，工作人员在重庆虬龙科技有限公司生产车间将生产好的电动摩托车打包。中新社记者 何蓬磊 摄。豆包下载对此有专业解读
Россиянам закрыли доступ к Civilization VI и другим играм14:20
The usual response to reports like these is to claim they’re based on people using older LLMs, and the models coming out now are the truly revolutionary ones, which won’t have any of those problems. For example, this is the main argument that’s been leveled against the METR study I mentioned above. But that argument was flimsy to begin with (since it’s rarely accompanied by the kind of evidence needed to back up the claim), and its repeated usage is self-discrediting: if the people claiming “this time is the world-changing revolutionary leap, for sure” were wrong all the prior times they said that (as they have to have been, since if any prior time had actually been the revolutionary leap they wouldn’t need to say this time will be), why should anyone believe them this time?